Disclosure Details

Twitter Crime - 925/12

Dated: 10 Dec 2012

Date of request:      22/11/2012

Date of response:   10/12/2012

Provision of information held by Northumbria Police made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the 'Act')(FOIA)

Thank you for your email dated 22 November  2012 in which you made a request for access to certain information which may be held by Northumbria Police.

As you may be aware the purpose of the Act is to allow a general right of access to information held by a Public Authority (including the Police), subject to certain limitations and exemptions.

You asked: 

  1. In the six month period from 1.5.12 to 31.10.12 how many crimes were logged by your force where Twitter was recorded as being an element in the offence. [Note: I would hope that this could be achieved by a computer search on the MO of the crimes for the word ‘Twitter’ or ‘tweet’].

  2. Please provide me with a table showing a breakdown of the crimes from Q.1 that are ‘linked’ to Twitter by its mention in the MO.

  3. Taking the month of September please provide me with copies of the first 10 MOs that mention either Twitter or Tweet. [Note: To avoid falling into an exemption I am content for the names, ages, addresses, geography or any other detail to be redacted to allow the disclosure of the incident and how it relates to Twitter. 

In response:

We have now had the opportunity to fully consider your request and I provide a response for your attention.

Following receipt of your request, searches were conducted with the Corporate Development Department of Northumbria Police.  I can confirm that the information you have requested is not held by Northumbria Police. No such offences have been recorded.

Northumbria Police can neither confirm nor deny that it holds any other information relating to this request as the duty in Section 1(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 does not apply, by virtue of the following exemption:-

Section 23 (5) Information relating to the Security bodies

Section 23 is an absolute class-based exemption and therefore there is no requirement to conduct a harm or public interest test.  To give a statement of the reasons why neither confirming nor denying is appropriate in this case would itself involve the disclosure of exempt information, therefore under Section 17 (4), no explanation can be given.  It is therefore our opinion that the balance lies in favour of neither confirming nor denying as to whether any other information is held or not.

None of the above can be viewed as an inference that any other information does or does not exist.

Due to the different methods of recording information across 43 forces, a specific response from one constabulary should not be seen as an indication of what information could be supplied (within cost) by another.  Systems used for recording these figures are not generic, nor are the procedures used locally in capturing the crime data.  For this reason responses between forces may differ, and should not be used for comparative purposes.

The information we have supplied to you is likely to contain intellectual property rights of Northumbria Police.  Your use of the information must be strictly in accordance with the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended) or such other applicable legislation.  In particular, you must not re-use this information for any commercial purpose.

How to complain

If you are unhappy with our decision or do not consider that we have handled your request properly and we are unable to resolve this issue informally, you are entitled to make a formal complaint to us under our complaints procedure which can be found at: http://www.northumbria.police.uk/foi/disclosurelog/foicomprights.asp

If you are still unhappy after we have investigated your complaint and reported to you the outcome, you may complain directly to the Information Commissioner’s Office and request that they investigate to ascertain whether we have dealt with your request in accordance with the Act.


FOI Complaint Rights Procedure_tcm4-67103